- Editorial Policies
- Appeals and Complaints
- Authorship Principles
- Biosafety and Biosecurity
- Citations
- Competing Interests
- Complementary and Alternative Medicine Standards for Research
- Confidentiality
- Corrections and Retractions
- Data Availability Statement
- Ethical responsibilities of authors
- Informed Consent
- Portable Peer Review
- Predatory Journals and References
- Preprint Sharing
- Policy, Process and Guidance for Peer Reviewers
- Removal of Published Content
- Research involving animals, and their data or biological material
- Research Involving Human Participants, their Data or Biological Material
- Research Involving Human Embryos
- Research Involving Palaeontological and Geological Material
- Sex and Gender in Research (SAGER Guidelines)
- Standards of Reporting
- Utilization of plants, algae, fungi
Resources
Standards of Reporting
Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of research. For biomedical and biological research, the checklists below must be completed before peer review, and made available to the Editors and reviewers.
Randomized controlled trials: CONSORT
Randomized controlled trial protocols: SPIRIT
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA
Case reports: CARE
Preclinical animal studies: ARRIVE
In addition, Springer Nature strongly encourages the use of the following checklists and reporting guidelines:
Observational studies: STROBE
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses protocols: PRISMA-P
Diagnostic/prognostic studies: STARD and TRIPOD
Clinical practice guidelines: AGREE and RIGHT
Qualitative research: SRQR and COREQ
Quality improvement studies: SQUIRE
Economic evaluations: CHEERS